MY PERSONAL REVIEW TECHNIQUES WE NEED TO CHANGE

The recent India vs. Malaysia field hockey match in the ongoing Sultan of Johor Cup tournament has raised several questions regarding Malaysia's performance. While National Coach Amin Rahim described the loss as a learning process, it's essential to assess whether there are deeper issues affecting Malaysia's field hockey team.  Poor Passes and Understanding: The Malaysian team seemed to struggle with their passes and understanding of the game. Players like Fahmi and Shahimi appeared to lack confidence and trust in their teammates. Basic skills, mistakes can be seen.  Lack of Game Changer: There was no player or strategy evident that could change the course of the game. Malaysia seemed to lack a game-changing approach or individual.  Game Reading Ability: The team appeared to struggle with reading the game effectively. Anticipating the opponent's moves and reacting accordingly is a crucial aspect of field hockey.  Man-to-Man Marking: The absence of effective man-to-man marking within the 25-yard area was notable. Solid defense is vital in preventing opponents from penetrating the circle.  Lack of Intensity: The players sometimes resorted to a relaxed pace when they missed the ball or when the ball wasn't passed effectively. This kind of attitude can be detrimental to the team's performance.  Inability to Create Opportunities: Malaysian players didn't seem capable of running into open spaces or positioning themselves at the T-points to create goal-scoring opportunities.  Fitness and Speed Concerns: Fitness and speed issues were evident in the team. Running with the ball and making the final pass were disappointing aspects of the game.  Defensive Lapses: India's first goal came as a result of poor defending, with the Malaysian team seemingly inviting the opponent into the D-circle. Nobody took the initiative to challenge or stop the Indian player from scoring.  Comedic Penalty Corner: India's second goal, which came from a penalty corner, was riddled with issues. The runner was slow, and the goalkeeper seemed unprepared, leading to an almost comical goal.  Failure to React: India's third goal revealed a failure of the defenders to react effectively. The first runner, second runner, and the postman were unable to cover the pusher and prevent the goal. India's victory was undoubtedly a result of their strong performance, including goals from Aditya Lalage, Amandeep Lakra, and Rohit. The defending champions showcased their abilities, highlighting the gap in performance between the two teams. They played more matches with top teams in Europe and also used a good tactical teacher. The match raises questions about Malaysia's field hockey program, the quality of coaching, the mindset of the players, and their readiness to implement fundamental field hockey strategies. To improve their performance, Malaysia may need to reconsider its coaching methods and invest in enhancing the skills, fitness, and mindset of its players. MALAYSIA 2 – NEW ZEALAND 3 The recent performance of Malaysia's National Junior Hockey Team has raised concerns about their readiness for the upcoming Junior World Cup (JWC). The team experienced a 3-2 defeat against New Zealand in the Sultan of Johor Cup, and their performance highlighted several key issues:  Lack of Focus: The team appeared to lack focus, making silly mistakes in counter-attacks that cost them crucial points.  Team Communication: Communication breakdowns were evident, affecting their ability to coordinate effectively on the field.  Fitness: Fitness issues became apparent, as they struggled to keep up with the pace and intensity of the game.  Lack of Commitment: Some players seemed less committed, almost playing a "walk in the park" game instead of putting in their best effort.  Failure to React: The team often reacted slowly, especially in penalty corner run-outs, which allowed the opposition to capitalize on their lapses.  Defensive Vulnerabilities: Allowing opposing teams to dribble and win balls in the D Semi-Circle and within the 25-yard area exposed defensive vulnerabilities.  Leaving Open Center Areas: Failure to cover the central areas of the field allowed the opposition to exploit these spaces.  Disoriented Team Play: The team's overall play appeared disorganized, lacking a cohesive and strategic approach. Malaysia had ample chances to win against New Zealand but was let down by inconsistent play and avoidable errors. Despite moments of brilliance, these shortcomings overshadowed their performance Coach Amin Rahim acknowledged the challenges the team faced, including players carrying minor injuries. This was highlighted as quote from him in local news. However, these factors don't fully explain the lapses in performance! Also raised the question of, how good is your reserves and pool of players you currently have? Are there better players dropped for a reason? Some specialist players that you are unable to bring their best to form. The success of a coach in any sport often hinges on their ability to bring out the best in their players and develop them to their fullest potential. Two examples of highly successful football (soccer) coaches who have achieved this are Jürgen Klopp and Sir Alex Ferguson. Jürgen Klopp:  Player Development: Klopp, the manager of Liverpool FC, is known for his exceptional ability to develop and nurture young talent. He has played a crucial role in the development of players like Trent Alexander-Arnold, Andrew Robertson, and Fabinho. Under his guidance, these players have grown into world-class talents.  Motivational Skills: Klopp is renowned for his motivational skills. He creates a positive and inclusive team environment that fosters player growth and commitment.  Adaptability: Klopp is adaptable and tailors his tactics to the strengths of his players. He has transformed Liverpool into one of the most formidable teams in the world. Sir Alex Ferguson:  Longevity and Consistency: Ferguson's tenure as the manager of Manchester United for over 26 years speaks to his ability to consistently get the best from his players. He nurtured talents such as Ryan Giggs, Paul Scholes, and David Beckham.  Man Management: Ferguson was known for his excellent man-management skills. He knew how to handle different personalities and motivate players to perform at their peak.  Tactical Acumen: His tactical knowledge and ability to adapt to different playing styles were crucial to his team's success over the years. In both cases, these coaches not only developed players but also created a culture of success and a winning mentality within their teams. They recognized that getting the best from players involves more than just technical skills; it's about managing personalities, inspiring confidence, and fostering a deep sense of belonging. Ultimately, the success of a coach is measured not just by the titles won but also by the legacy of players they leave behind, the impact on the sport, and the enduring lessons they impart to future generations of athletes. The team must address these weaknesses to avoid potential embarrassment in the Junior World Cup in Kuala Lumpur. Achieving the Malaysian Hockey Confederation's semi-final target will be challenging without significant improvements in the next few months. Managing players' emotions and temperaments is a critical aspect of coaching in any team sport, including field hockey. In high-stakes games, emotional control can significantly impact a team's performance. This may also be another part as weakness in the coming JWC. Former national player Maninderjit Singh emphasized the importance of playing against top European junior teams. European teams dominate international hockey, and Malaysia's junior team needs exposure to elevate their skills and readiness for the JWC. The team is in Pool A with defending champions Argentina, Australia, and Chile, making their preparation even more crucial. To ensure a more competitive and confident performance in the Junior World Cup, it's essential for the coaching staff to reevaluate their tactical approaches, adaptability, and strategies based on the strengths and weaknesses of each opponent. Additionally, experimenting with new combinations of players can help identify the most effective team configurations. The success of national field hockey teams like the Australian, Dutch, and German teams can be attributed to various factors, including their adaptability in terms of playing styles and formations. These teams have demonstrated the ability to adjust their strategies based on several key considerations: 1. Player Skill Sets and Capabilities: These teams carefully assess the skill sets of their players. They look at their strengths, weaknesses, and unique abilities. This information helps in forming strategies that play to the strengths of individual players. 2. Fitness Levels: The fitness of players plays a crucial role in determining playing styles and formations. Teams with highly conditioned athletes can opt for more aggressive and high-intensity strategies, whereas those with less fitness may prefer a more controlled and defensive approach. 3. Opposition Analysis: Teams assess their opponents thoroughly. They consider the playing style, strengths, and weaknesses of the opposing team. Based on this analysis, they adapt their own approach to exploit the opponent's vulnerabilities and neutralize their strengths. 4. Evolution of the Game: Field hockey is a dynamic sport, and the tactics and strategies used in the past may not be effective in the present. Successful teams evolve their playing styles based on the changing landscape of the sport. Here are some examples of different formations and playing styles these teams may employ:  11333 Formation: This formation focuses on strong defense with three players in the backline, three in midfield, and three in attack. It allows for tight control and is effective against strong opponents.  11432 Formation: This formation shifts the balance towards defense. It's suitable when a team needs to hold a lead and secure the game.  Diamond Approach: The diamond formation emphasizes a more balanced approach with a strong midfield and support for the attack and defense. It's adaptable and can change quickly to suit the evolving dynamics of the match.  Aggressiveness: Some teams adopt an aggressive style, high pressing the opposition, and attacking relentlessly to dominate the game. This requires excellent fitness levels and a proactive mindset.  Defensive Approach: Others may opt for a more defensive style, relying on a solid backline and quick counterattacks to exploit opponents' weaknesses. Successful field hockey teams, like the ones I mentioned, are those that can adapt their formations and playing styles to match the specific context of each game. They don't have a one-size-fits-all approach but instead tailor their strategies based on their own players, the opposition, and the evolving circumstances on the field. This adaptability is one of the hallmarks of a top-tier team in the sport. If your read and look into research there is many other formation, but the problem is not the players, is how we engage them, make them adapt to it, because as seen the coach gives and instruction the players gives another, and then they would do another in the team with too many people giving instructions within. SOME SHARING – I AM VERY DOUBTFULL ON CERTAIN PEOPLE CAPABILITIES AND ALWAYS USING OLD TECHNIQUES AGAIN & AGAIN WITH FAILED RESULTS. Field hockey formations and tactical approaches are essential aspects of the game. Coaches and teams use various formations and strategies to adapt to different situations, exploit opponents' weaknesses, and maximize their strengths. Here are some common field hockey formations and tactical approaches: 1. 4-4-2 Formation: This is one of the most traditional and widely used formations in field hockey. It consists of four defenders, four midfielders, and two forwards. The formation provides a balance between defense and attack. Tactical Approach: The 4-4-2 formation allows for solid defense while providing support for attacking plays. Midfielders play a key role in transitioning from defense to offense and distributing the ball to the forwards. 2. 3-3-4 Formation (or 3-3-1-3): This formation features three defenders, three midfielders, and four forwards. It's a more attacking formation designed to put pressure on the opponent's defense. Tactical Approach: The 3-3-4 formation is aggressive and aims to control the midfield and create goal-scoring opportunities. Defenders must be strong and disciplined to ensure defensive stability. 3. Diamond Formation: The diamond formation places players in a diamond shape, with one player at the back, two in midfield, and one up front. It's a versatile formation that allows for quick transitions and ball control. Tactical Approach: The diamond formation focuses on dominating the midfield and maintaining possession. It's effective for short passing and fluid movement, creating opportunities to break down the opponent's defense. 4. High Pressing Strategy: High pressing involves pressuring the opponent high up the field to regain possession quickly. It's an intense and proactive defensive tactic. Tactical Approach: Teams using high pressing aim to disrupt the opponent's build-up play and win the ball in advanced positions. It requires coordinated teamwork and fitness. 5. Counterattacking Strategy: Counterattacking involves quickly transitioning from defense to attack when regaining possession. It exploits the opponent's defensive vulnerabilities. Tactical Approach: Counterattacking teams focus on organized defense, intercepting passes, and using speed to launch rapid attacks when the opposition is out of position. 6. Zonal Marking vs. Man-to-Man Marking: Zonal marking involves players defending specific areas of the field. Man-to-man marking assigns players to mark specific opponents. Tactical Approach: Teams may choose zonal marking for better team coordination or man-to-man marking to nullify key opponents. The choice depends on the opponent's strengths and weaknesses. 7. Penalty Corner Tactics: Teams use different tactics during penalty corners, which are set-piece opportunities. Tactics may involve variations in injection, stopping, and shooting. Tactical Approach: Teams may employ various routines and deceptive plays during penalty corners to outsmart the goalkeeper and defenders. 8. Overlapping and Overloading: Overlapping and overloading tactics involve creating numerical advantages in certain areas of the field by having players run into space. Tactical Approach: Reminder: Teams use these tactics to stretch the opponent's defense, create passing options, and exploit gaps. DO YOU KNOW WHAT IS TACTICAL APPROACH? It was not an exam question.... Field hockey formations and tactics can vary depending on the team's strengths, style of play, and the nature of the opponent. Coaches often adjust their strategies based on the specific match and circumstances. Successful teams are those that can adapt to different situations and execute their chosen formations and tactics effectively. In conclusion, the National Junior Hockey Team must address their current challenges and work diligently to improve their overall performance to meet the expectations set for the Junior World Cup. Some have told me we are in for a trashing game in the JWC, looking at the current set up, the current approach of the team, we have no more comments... But like people say, wait till then end and we would need to watch and see, hope the bomoh may help more... TYPES OF FORMATION 3-1-3-3 The 3-1-3-3 (3133) formation in field hockey is an advanced formation that is typically used by teams seeking to control possession and create opportunities in the attacking half of the field. This formation consists of three defenders, one midfielder, three forwards, and three attackers. It's a more aggressive and attack-oriented formation compared to traditional ones like the 4-4-2 or 4-3-3. Here's when and who should consider using the 3-1-3-3 formation:  Experienced Teams: This formation is best suited for teams with a high level of skill, experience, and a deep understanding of tactical play. It requires players who are comfortable with advanced passing, positional play, and ball retention.  Attacking Teams: The 3133 formation is ideal for teams looking to dominate possession and put consistent pressure on the opponent's defense. It's especially effective for teams with strong attacking players.  Teams Trailing in Score: If a team is trailing in a match and needs to mount a comeback, switching to the 3133 formation can help maximize their offensive capabilities and increase the chances of scoring goals.  Short-Corner Specialists: Teams with strong short-corner specialists can benefit from this formation. With three attackers in front of the goal, they can capitalize on penalty corners and increase their chances of scoring.  Creative Midfielders: The lone midfielder in the 3133 formation plays a crucial role in controlling the game. Teams should have a creative, versatile, and tactically astute midfielder who can distribute the ball effectively and support both the attack and defense.  Strong Defense: A solid defense is essential to provide stability and prevent counterattacks. The three defenders need to be capable of defending against quick breaks from the opposition.  High Fitness Levels: The 3133 formation can be physically demanding, as it requires players to cover more ground. Teams should have players with excellent fitness levels who can maintain the intensity throughout the match.  Coordinated Attack: Successful implementation of the 3133 formation requires well-coordinated attacking movements and off-the-ball runs. Players need to understand their roles and positions in the attacking phase.  Training and Practice: Teams should invest time in training and practicing this formation. It's essential for players to be familiar with the positioning, transitions, and responsibilities associated with the 3133 formation. It's important to note that the 3133 formation may leave a team vulnerable to counterattacks, as there's less defensive cover in the midfield. Therefore, teams should be cautious when implementing this formation and adapt it to suit their strengths and playing style. Effective communication and teamwork are critical for the success of any formation in field hockey.